Playwright Alexander Harrington has much to say about
President Lyndon Johnson in The Great Society, the compelling and ambitious new
play now on view at the Clurman Theatre at Theatre Row.
With a running time closing in on three hours, some pruning
is in order. Yet it is easy to
sympathize with Mr. Harrington’s impulse to avoid leaving out anything that
would shed light on Mr. Johnson, a complicated larger-than-life personality whose
Presidential career was launched with one instantaneous explosive event and was
later brought to its knees by a more prolonged one.
I’m speaking, of course, of the assassination of Mr.
Johnson’s predecessor, President Kennedy, and the impossibly-out-of-control
crisis known as Vietnam. Either of these
bookend events could have inspired a play in and of itself. Does anyone, for instance, remember the 1967
eviscerating satire MacBird by Barbara Garson, in which President and
Lady Bird Johnson were depicted as Shakespeare’s ambitious assassins, the
Macbeths? (Starring Stacy Keach and Rue
McClanahan as the wanton couple, it left an indelible memory in my teenage mind,
falling so close in time to the events it depicted).
But Mr. Harrington has no such ax to grind, other than to illuminate our understanding of a President whose place in history remains opaque. He calls this play The Great Society in order
to focus on Mr. Johnson’s powerful social justice agenda, one that extended to civil right for African Americans, access to medical care for all,
and an all-out assault on poverty in America.
Lest we forget, Mr. Johnson used his highly polished skills as a tenacious
persuader and arm-twister to push through the Senate and House of
Representatives a remarkable number of landmark pieces of legislation—among
them, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and Medicare—and to establish such programs as Head Start, VISTA, the Job Corps, and the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
All of this occurred under the noses of the Conservative
members of Congress, who found themselves outranked and outmaneuvered at every
turn. (I pause here to note that in
the current political climate, the Conservatives are doing their very best to
dismantle every vestige of the progressive programs that first saw the light of day during the Johnson
Administration.)
But Mr. Harrington’s play is not just about progressive
politics. President Johnson was a complex man,
with an outsize personality characteristic of someone with bipolar
disorder. He was given to periods of
indefatigable mania and bouts of soul-withering depression, both of which are
on display in The Great Society. Like
many others who see themselves as visionary leaders, Mr. Johnson suffered from
great self-doubt, and demanded both gratitude and loyalty from those on whom he
bestowed his largesse. This led to
episodes of bombastic anger and rifts between Mr. Johnson and members of his
inner circle, including his Vice President Hubert Humphrey.
It also led to some interesting interactions, congenial and
otherwise, between Mr. Johnson and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., even when they were on the same side of issues of civil rights. Mr. Harrington has written several scenes
(not all of them historically accurate, as the playwright explains in an essay
in the playbill) that bring together the two great leaders, who often quarrel over “timing.”
Other scenes in the play depict Mr. Johnson’s interactions
with members of the Senate and Congress, with his wife Lady Bird, and with his
advisors. Key among these is his
Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, instrumental in prodding Mr. Johnson into
escalating the Vietnam conflict into full-scale war.
Ultimately, it is Vietnam that pulls at and plagues the Johnson
presidency to the end.
The Democrats are frantic that, in his first Presidential run after completing President Kennedy’s term, Mr. Johnson must not be seen as too “dovish” on Vietnam, especially in the wake of his opponent’s (Barry Goldwater) staunch hawkish stance. Even so, Johnson wants to limit the war and agrees with those who advise for an early withdrawal of U.S. troops. He gladly accepts McNamara's estimate that it will likely be over by 1965, shortly after the election. Of course, that never comes to pass, and the war begins to dominate every conversation and every decision, and the shouts of anti-war protestors (“Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”) drown out all else.
The Democrats are frantic that, in his first Presidential run after completing President Kennedy’s term, Mr. Johnson must not be seen as too “dovish” on Vietnam, especially in the wake of his opponent’s (Barry Goldwater) staunch hawkish stance. Even so, Johnson wants to limit the war and agrees with those who advise for an early withdrawal of U.S. troops. He gladly accepts McNamara's estimate that it will likely be over by 1965, shortly after the election. Of course, that never comes to pass, and the war begins to dominate every conversation and every decision, and the shouts of anti-war protestors (“Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”) drown out all else.
Mr. Harrington does a fine job of capturing all this grand
sweep of history in The Great Society. I
would simply urge him to go back and excise those occasional places where
dramatic intercourse crosses the line into the territory of classroom lecture. Or, if he simply can’t let go, he should
perhaps turn this one play into two—one ending at Johnson’s defeat of
Goldwater; the other ending as it does now, with Johnson’s capitulation to the
tide of popular opinion.
Meanwhile, we have this production, which continues at the
Clurman through August 24. While it doesn’t
completely succeed at avoiding a certain static quality (how many ways are
there to depict a meeting in the Oval Office?), the play is well served by its cast
of 15 (plus one offstage voice), doing excellent work under the direction of
Seth Duerr.
Particularly effective are Yaakov Sullivan as Senator
Richard Russell, Curtis Wiley as the Rev. Martin Luther King, Charles Gray as
Bayard Rustin, Reed Armstrong (most evocative of Robert McNamara), Jeff
Burchfield as a simpering George Wallace, and, especially, Mitch Tebo as Lyndon
Johnson, who—even in the early preview that I saw—dominated the stage just as
his character dominated everyone and everything around him.
The way of doing business in the political arena has shifted from the one-on-one back-room deal making at which President Johnson was so adept. The Great Society occupies the territory of such plays as Gore Vidal's The Best Man in depicting the office of the Presidency from another time and place. Who knows when we will see another personality come along with the strength, determination, and clout of Lyndon Johnson?
Feel free to tell your friends about this blog, and to
share your own theater stories by posting a comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment